What in the world has become of the art of typography?
- March 24th, 2010
- Posted in Thoughts
- Write comment
Typography and type setting have gone through quite a migration over the last 40 plus years.
When I started, the use of lead type was no longer being used except in newspapers. However, we still counted every character (letter for those of you who think a character is the guy next door) and massaged every line so that the block of text looked exactly like we wanted.
Headlines were usually hand drawn with a magic marker on our layout and then everything was sent to the type house. The next day we would get back a printout with our text and headline in the fonts we requested. Then the fun began.
With X-ACTO in hand, we’d cut and paste. Sometimes each line. Sometimes between each character until the color of the words and the line were even and read exactly the way we wanted it too.
Maybe it was the hours we spent under the tutelage of masters like Mort Leach and Doyald Young that made us so acutely aware of letter spacing, word and line color and rivers of white running down the body of text.
In the words of Gene Federico, “When the designer doesn’t read the copy to catch the sound of the words, he runs the risk of misusing the typography. If the rhythm of the words is disregarded the copy is likely to be laid out incorrectly”.
Somehow the computer replacing the drawing board has given rise to some really bad, often cute use of type. Don’t get me wrong, I couldn’t live without my computer and the amazing programs.
But it does make me wonder if a lot of art directors and designers today ever had to hand draw a group of letters with pencil, pen, ink and use a brush with black and white paint for touch up? It is an art form. And in my opinion, learning the art would improve the looks of things.